zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. Sequoi+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-06 21:03:36
To others: if you’re downvoting a link a massacre because it feels like the wrong kind of comment, I encourage you to at least read through about the event. I had not learned about this before. It’s perfectly interesting and I think the comment is worth considering in its intent.

“On 14 August 2013, the Egyptian police and to a lesser extent the armed forces, under the command of then-Defense Minister Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, used lethal force to clear two camps of protesters in Cairo. Estimates of those killed vary from 600 to 2,600.”

replies(1): >>girvo+D
2. girvo+D[view] [source] 2025-12-06 21:09:13
>>Sequoi+(OP)
Not that I’m one to do so, but comments like that usually get downvoted as it’s a quintessential example of whataboutism.

Egypts government is abhorrent.

replies(1): >>Waterl+b1
◧◩
3. Waterl+b1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 21:15:27
>>girvo+D
I’m not sure this is whataboutism. To me at least, the distinguishing feature is using a whatabout as a form of deflection or absolution.
replies(2): >>jraine+n2 >>luckyl+C3
◧◩◪
4. jraine+n2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 21:24:41
>>Waterl+b1
Well we’re talking about Egypt & rhetoric now, so …
◧◩◪
5. luckyl+C3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 21:36:58
>>Waterl+b1
"yeah, yeah, that's bad, BUT HERE'S SOMETHING ELSE WE SHOULD TALK ABOUT"

Whataboutism doesn't give absolution, it's only meant to deflect, as ks2048 did.

[go to top]