> in between “bash script” and “real developer”.
One of my coworkers gave me some great perspective by saying, "at least it's not written in Bash!"
It certainly was the major factor in how I connected the dots!
Haven’t really thought about it until now, but I suppose having Larry Wall and Randal Schwartz telling you to RTFM guides your early development in a certain manner.
I certainly have never considered myself a developer or programmer though. I can pick up enough syntax to get a quick hack done or start a MVP to demo my ideas, but I leave the “big boy” dev stuff to the professionals who can run circles around me.
I'm sure there are people who started in a language and later found something that made more sense. I'm just reflecting on what I've found in my experience.
I wish bash was the thing that was dying. As an industry, we need to make better choices.
When at University the academic running the programming language course was adamant the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis applied to programming language. ie language influences the way you think.
Chet Ramey became the primary maintainer of Bash in the early 1990s and is the sole author of every bash update (and Readline) since then. That would be an enormous task for a team of 100, no less a team of one.
I've become quite a fan (after struggling mightily with its seemingly millions of quirks.
I write bash scripts only because I can rely on it being there.