zlacker

[parent] [thread] 9 comments
1. baubin+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-06 14:36:09
A simpler solution is to allow the device owner to turn off ads. Ads on purchased devices should be opt-in, not default and not mandatory.
replies(3): >>ForceB+i2 >>jeroen+Ka >>Zambyt+Wh1
2. ForceB+i2[view] [source] 2025-12-06 14:57:04
>>baubin+(OP)
Unfortunately, the whole point is that along with the fridge/whatever tech you purchase a billboard and willingly bring ads into your home. Of course ads on purchased devices should be mandatory AND we customers will soon be expected to pay a "subscription fee" to temporarily unsubscribe from the ads. What kind of company would possibly make ads opt-in? IMO allowing the owner to turn off ads is a problem (for the company), not a solution
replies(2): >>immibi+6a >>lkbm+nj
◧◩
3. immibi+6a[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 15:57:35
>>ForceB+i2
That's fine. They can simply charge for the product what it costs to make, like they always did before, and if they find that nobody uses the "enable ads" button (because why would they?) they can save some maintenance effort by removing that button. They might even find the fridge doesn't need a wifi chip and can be cheaper.
4. jeroen+Ka[view] [source] 2025-12-06 16:03:00
>>baubin+(OP)
It's not as easy with some digital devices (even TVs these days), but fridges are a category where I can decisively say people who don't want ads can just buy a version without ads.

If a fridge maker wants to sell you a cheaper fridge subsidized by ads, I don't think that's a problem as long as tracking is optional.

replies(2): >>notpus+Oj >>ikr678+Hs1
◧◩
5. lkbm+nj[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 17:10:41
>>ForceB+i2
> What kind of company would possibly make ads opt-in?

Amazon has for years: Kindle with ads on the lock screen is $20 cheaper than without: https://www.amazon.com/All-new-Amazon-Kindle-Paperwhite-glar...

◧◩
6. notpus+Oj[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 17:13:26
>>jeroen+Ka
That’s true as long as there are options that don’t have ads.

There used to be TVs that don’t have ads or tracking, but that’s not the case anymore (or so I’ve heard; haven’t bought a TV personally yet). I don’t see why fridges would be immune to that.

replies(2): >>Ekaros+lk >>jeroen+ks
◧◩◪
7. Ekaros+lk[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 17:17:42
>>notpus+Oj
At least with fridges a screen is extra cost to be built in.

On other hand with TVs unless you are doing just a monitor, you need something to control it. And I mean like digital TV, selecting input, possibly show some overlay or controls. And at that point just slapping a computer in it is lot faster development cycle. And then you might as well support streaming services as general population seem to want those.

◧◩◪
8. jeroen+ks[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 18:24:40
>>notpus+Oj
Smart TVs became the norm when they reached the same price point as normal TVs. That's when the ad bullshit came up. You can still buy smart TVs without ads though, going for Android TV and put it in "basic TV mode" will disable pretty much all the crapware. You won't be able to use the TV to watch Netflix or HBO without a third party streaming dongle, though, which is probably why nobody does it.

The smart part of a fridge isn't inherent to the technology necessary (unlike DRM'ed TV streams and apps). In fact, bolting the display (or ice maker for that matter) into the door makes it conduct more heat and therefore perform worse. I don't know about other economic regions, but here the energy label is quite clearly visible on the front of every fridge, so they can't hide the power waste either.

I have yet to see a smart fridge cheaper than a similar normal fridge. Partially because manufacturers seem to market this crap like a luxury feature.

The cheapest smart fridge I can find on a reliable web store, at least here, is three times the price of a normal fridge (€1500 vs €500). Even in the huge "American style" fridges, there's a sizable price difference (€1500 vs €1000) before you get to the first smart fridge.

9. Zambyt+Wh1[view] [source] 2025-12-07 02:19:13
>>baubin+(OP)
The word for software that intentionally subverts the owners intent is called malware, and it's already illegal in the United States. We don't even need any new laws, we just need to be brave enough to enforce them.
◧◩
10. ikr678+Hs1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-07 05:01:21
>>jeroen+Ka
I think we are about 10 years away from dumb fridges only being available from specialized catering or kitchen supply distributors. The screens are coming, they start as the 'luxury' option and then filter down to every single model.

Consider - I vehemently do not want a computer screen in my vehicle. I specifically bought a particular model in 2019 without one. If I want to upgrade, I am unable to exercise my preference though, as new cars without screens are no longer offered for sale.

[go to top]