zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. xattt+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-06 12:56:47
How did people justify that cost? Was 6k ”more affordable” back then? Was there more money to spend?
replies(3): >>magic_+c5 >>trollb+O9 >>Supern+ea
2. magic_+c5[view] [source] 2025-12-06 13:40:28
>>xattt+(OP)
Well, some people needed it for work, or for university. Some people got it from work to be able to work at home. Others may have had experience with 8 bit machines and had money when the PC hit the stores.
3. trollb+O9[view] [source] 2025-12-06 14:23:50
>>xattt+(OP)
My parents saved up for years and then kept the same computer for years more. It was normal to have a machine for 10 years, and just one per household.

Upgrading with a hard disk, a second floppy drive, or upgrading the graphics card was common.

4. Supern+ea[view] [source] 2025-12-06 14:26:58
>>xattt+(OP)
> Was there more money to spend?

In California, there certainly was. The US economy had already started its decline, but from such a high that well-to-do Americans hadn't noticed. By contrast, because Europe had had to be rebuilt after WWII, the general populace had benefitted far less from the postwar boom.

In 1982, my family had a relatively comfortable middle class existence, but buying a home computer that cost (at the time) about half as much as a one-bedroom apartment would have been absolutely unimaginable to my parents. The ZX81 they bought for me cost £99.

[go to top]