zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. _tk_+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-06 12:46:20
That’s exactly what would happen in a simulation.
replies(3): >>andsoi+j >>beardy+y6 >>karmak+Hw
2. andsoi+j[view] [source] 2025-12-06 12:49:18
>>_tk_+(OP)
What do you mean?
replies(1): >>stfp+f7
3. beardy+y6[view] [source] 2025-12-06 13:41:48
>>_tk_+(OP)
But the folks running the simulation don't realise they are in a simulation.
◧◩
4. stfp+f7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 13:49:40
>>andsoi+j
Let’s assume it’s simulations all the way down and we exist in plane P=n. The question is are we at n=0.

Looks like this result says we can’t simulate our plane in a computer. But the stuff in that simulation exists in P=n+1. So maybe the conclusion is “you can’t simulate n from within n+1” which means we can’t simulate our own plane, let alone our potential parent, and doesn’t mean we don’t have one

replies(1): >>downbo+yg
◧◩◪
5. downbo+yg[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 15:14:31
>>stfp+f7
Take the room you're in and simulate it with a computer. Now, bring the computer into the room.
6. karmak+Hw[view] [source] 2025-12-06 17:18:21
>>_tk_+(OP)
Yup, if we're in a simulation pretty much all bets are off. Mandela Effect could merely be update patches. It could patch a proof that our world is not a simulation.
[go to top]