zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. cs702+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-06 12:41:38
Yes, the OP claims many small-fleet drivers are being overworked, but provides zero evidence of it. By evidence, I mean data, not anecdotes. Do you have data on this?

---

EDIT: Link to data is at >>46173013

It looks like crash rates jumped after the pandemic, then declined in 2022 and 2023, contradicting the OP.

replies(1): >>jezzam+s1
2. jezzam+s1[view] [source] 2025-12-06 12:55:50
>>cs702+(OP)
The article provide this: "Despite billions spent on safety technology, fatal truck-involved crashes are up ≈40% since 2014"

Though I wonder how much that number compares to how much the trucking industry grew in that time. If it grew 200% that would actually mean a big win for safety.

Edit: some quick, AI driven research suggests it might've grown 20%. So... Still an issue

replies(1): >>cs702+d2
◧◩
3. cs702+d2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 13:01:34
>>jezzam+s1
I just looked briefly at the data provided by the NHTSA, and what I see is a jump after the pandemic, followed by declines in 2022 and 2023, contradicting the OP:

https://www.nhtsa.gov/crash-data-systems/fatality-analysis-r...

https://highways.dot.gov/safety/learn-safety/roadway-safety-...

replies(3): >>jezzam+c7 >>xethos+Wl >>useful+kL
◧◩◪
4. jezzam+c7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 13:44:42
>>cs702+d2
Good find!
replies(1): >>Tadpol+WD
◧◩◪
5. xethos+Wl[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 15:51:32
>>cs702+d2
Because you only went to 2018. The article mentions 2014, and if we use your own DOT tool to build a table [0] from 2013 to 2023 (the latest year available), and filter to include large trucks and fatal collisions, we see... a ~42% increase in fatal accidents from 2014-2023

[0] https://cdan.dot.gov/files/files/e2451bc7-e1c3-4942-93f2-af6...

replies(1): >>useful+rL
◧◩◪◨
6. Tadpol+WD[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 18:18:13
>>jezzam+c7
No, he's intentionally misconstruing the data. It spiked and went down, but it's still almost 50% higher than 2014 - the article's date range.
◧◩◪
7. useful+kL[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 19:12:51
>>cs702+d2
Your second link shows a slight reduction from '21 to '22, but even then it's still significantly higher than during '18 - '20. And it doesn't show anything prior to '18.
◧◩◪◨
8. useful+rL[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 19:13:46
>>xethos+Wl
I get a 401 unauthorized for that link
replies(1): >>xethos+JA1
◧◩◪◨⬒
9. xethos+JA1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-07 03:50:31
>>useful+rL
Yeah, me too. I tried to avoid linking the actual page (the generated table has a yellow banner explicitely calling out that the link cannot be bookmarked), but with a private window I get 401'd too.

Unfortunately I don't have time to go beyond an imgur link, or asking you to generate the table yourself :/

https://imgur.com/a/Zn0UFbG

[go to top]