zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. 8n4vid+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-06 06:33:10
I still haven't witnessed a serious attempt at passing the Turing test. Are we just assuming its been beaten, or have people tried?

Like if you put someone in an online chat and ask them to identify if the person they're talking to is a bot or not, you're telling me your average joe honestly can't tell?

A blog post or a random HN comment, sure, it can be hard to tell, but if you allow some back and forth.. i think we can still sniff out the AIs.

replies(1): >>akobol+ba
2. akobol+ba[view] [source] 2025-12-06 09:11:59
>>8n4vid+(OP)
A couple of months ago I saw a paper (can't remember if published or just on arxiv) in which Turing's original 3-player Imitation Game was played with a human interrogator trying to discern which of a human responder and an LLM was the human. When the LLM was a recent ChatGPT version, the human interrogator guessed it to be the human over 70% of the time; when the LLM was weaker (I think Llama 2), the human interrogator guessed it to be the human something like 54% of the time.

IOW, LLMs pass the Turing test.

replies(1): >>knolli+up1
◧◩
3. knolli+up1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 21:12:04
>>akobol+ba
The prompt for the LLM was to respond with short phrases, though. I don't know if that's fair since it hides it when there is useful utility.
[go to top]