zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. orbita+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-06 05:03:22
Does it do anything that Sidebery doesn't?
replies(1): >>chryso+u
2. chryso+u[view] [source] 2025-12-06 05:08:57
>>orbita+(OP)
An integrated experience. In the past I found that the vertical tab options in Firefox had the tabs duplicated across the side and the top, which I always found to be a subpar experience. Again, probably something you could accomplish with user.js and user.css but there's a good chance an update could break your modifications.
replies(1): >>gcr+X
◧◩
3. gcr+X[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 05:16:26
>>chryso+u
If you haven't tried firefox' vertical tabs recently, try it again. Firefox's default vertical tabs UI is quite nice now.
replies(2): >>chryso+M1 >>iriles+1e
◧◩◪
4. chryso+M1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 05:30:49
>>gcr+X
Seems quite similar to Zen's experience, except it seems to be missing folders (which I admittedly don't use often, but they're sometimes handy to group a Jira ticket with a PR, or similar). I'll probably still stick with Zen while it's around, and maybe I'll hop over to LibreWolf as I'm not too happy about Mozilla's recent stance on privacy.
replies(1): >>Futuri+m2
◧◩◪◨
5. Futuri+m2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 05:39:33
>>chryso+M1
Is it similar to tab groups? It's available on Firefox Nightly, don't know about stable.
replies(1): >>chryso+U7
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. chryso+U7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 07:14:11
>>Futuri+m2
Maybe! Folders in Zen let you group, label and collapse tabs, so if that's the same thing then yes.
◧◩◪
7. iriles+1e[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 08:51:53
>>gcr+X
I found it too buggy in my usage, it just doesn't compare to the polish in Zen or the other forks. Better just to use the horizontal tabs IMO.
[go to top]