zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. macNch+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-05 23:46:43
An interesting test in this vein that I read about in a comment on here is generating a 13 hour clock—I tried just about every prompting trick and clever strategy I could come up with across many image models with no success. I think there's so much training data of 12 hour clocks that just clobbers the instructions entirely. It'll make a regular clock that skips from 11 to 13, or a regular clock with a plaque saying "13 hour clock" underneath, but I haven't gotten an actual 13 hour clock yet.
replies(2): >>Restar+P4 >>raw_an+dz
2. Restar+P4[view] [source] 2025-12-06 00:25:43
>>macNch+(OP)
Right you are. It can do 26 hours just fine, but appears completely incapable when the layout would be too close to a normal clock.

https://gemini.google.com/share/b3b68deaa6e6

I thought giving it a setting would help, but just skip that first response to see what I mean.

replies(2): >>mkl+8f >>petter+4P
◧◩
3. mkl+8f[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 02:03:47
>>Restar+P4
That's a 24 hour clock that skips some numbers and puts other numbers out of order.
4. raw_an+dz[view] [source] 2025-12-06 06:10:04
>>macNch+(OP)
It was ugly. But I got ChatGPT to cheat and do it

https://chatgpt.com/share/6933c848-a254-8010-adb5-8f736bdc70...

This is the SVG it created.

https://imgur.com/a/LLpw8YK

◧◩
5. petter+4P[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 10:06:09
>>Restar+P4
"just fine" is not really an accurate description of that 26-hour clock
[go to top]