zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. issafr+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-05 21:49:14
If only there was an easy setup/tutorial for Usenet. I have no idea what I am supposed to pay for and what client program to use for acquiring files.
replies(4): >>spiral+3c >>ventur+pc >>tills1+fk >>lofasz+or
2. spiral+3c[view] [source] 2025-12-05 23:06:40
>>issafr+(OP)
Sounds like a feature, not a bug
replies(1): >>lukebe+6d
3. ventur+pc[view] [source] 2025-12-05 23:09:25
>>issafr+(OP)
I bet if you Google "how to get started with Usenet", someone has written about this.
◧◩
4. lukebe+6d[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 23:13:07
>>spiral+3c
the garden without the wall is trampled
5. tills1+fk[view] [source] 2025-12-06 00:10:00
>>issafr+(OP)
Having figured it out myself, I agree. And it's not obvious that you need both a Usenet _indexer_ (who tells you what content is available) and a Usenet provider (who actually serves you the content).

FWIW, and I'm not sure if this is against terms here, but I use newsgeek for the former and giganews for the latter. Both are paid services but reasonably priced imo. When I can find something on Usenet, it typically downloads with speeds > 10MBps vs. torrenting which can exceed that but is usually much slower.

You can use whatever client you want. I have the *arr stack mentioned elsewhere in this thread as well and SABnzbd is the recommended option there.

replies(1): >>issafr+Dt
6. lofasz+or[view] [source] 2025-12-06 01:12:18
>>issafr+(OP)
PAR2 files have their beauty
◧◩
7. issafr+Dt[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 01:31:40
>>tills1+fk
Are the downloads through http/tcp or some other protocol?
replies(1): >>RevEng+Ru
◧◩◪
8. RevEng+Ru[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 01:44:33
>>issafr+Dt
Between you and your provider the downloads are over HTTP. The distribution of content between the Usenet providers is over the Usenet protocol which predates HTTP and the WWW.
[go to top]