zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. slumbe+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-05 18:01:23
I disagree that it's a misconception. Yes, the premise is that the true 'monster' was the creator, but the monster itself is intentionally grotesque and disfigured to teach us the beauty on the inside lesson.
replies(1): >>enrage+08
2. enrage+08[view] [source] 2025-12-05 18:37:36
>>slumbe+(OP)
He is unsettling but definitely not simply grotesque and disfigured:

> His limbs were in proportion, and I had selected his features as beautiful. Beautiful! Great God! His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath; his hair was of a lustrous black, and flowing; his teeth of a pearly whiteness; but these luxuriances only formed a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes, that seemed almost of the same colour as the dun-white sockets in which they were set, his shrivelled complexion and straight black lips.

replies(1): >>Thorre+Mg2
◧◩
3. Thorre+Mg2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 14:24:07
>>enrage+08
That definitely sounds grotesque to me. Sure not "simply grotesque", but grotesque in a complex way.
[go to top]