zlacker

[parent] [thread] 11 comments
1. Telane+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-05 17:07:46
What 5-ish inch screen phone has even been released within the past 5 years? The only ones I can think of are the Unihertz phones, and those don't get a single update after getting shoved out the door, not to mention that they're probably full of Chinese backdoors. I'd buy that exact phone in a heartbeat if it didn't have those problems, and all the other ones I've seen have similar dealbreakers.
replies(3): >>hxtk+q2 >>clucki+r2 >>seba_d+SC
2. hxtk+q2[view] [source] 2025-12-05 17:17:56
>>Telane+(OP)
iPhone had the 12 and 13 mini, but they didn't sell, so there was no iPhone 14 mini and hasn't been one since. That was a 5.4" display.
replies(3): >>maelit+44 >>Wistar+M5 >>Telane+N8
3. clucki+r2[view] [source] 2025-12-05 17:17:58
>>Telane+(OP)
iPhone SE 3 was released in 2022
replies(1): >>Telane+59
◧◩
4. maelit+44[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 17:24:44
>>hxtk+q2
> but they didn't sell

What do you call "didn't sell" ? In numbers.

replies(1): >>nebula+97
◧◩
5. Wistar+M5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 17:32:44
>>hxtk+q2
I cherish my iPhone 12 Mini and treat it with great care as it is the form factor I want and I want it to last as long as possible.
◧◩◪
6. nebula+97[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 17:39:56
>>maelit+44
How about 3% of sales: https://www.macrumors.com/2022/04/21/iphone-13-mini-unpopula...
replies(2): >>MBCook+eB1 >>maelit+k62
◧◩
7. Telane+N8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 17:46:51
>>hxtk+q2
I skipped that one because my SE 2 was less than a year old and I didn't want to go up a size.
◧◩
8. Telane+59[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 17:48:04
>>clucki+r2
Very fair. I skipped it because my SE 2 was still going strong when that came out, which I kind of regret now, since I can't get a new SE 3 anymore.
9. seba_d+SC[view] [source] 2025-12-05 20:01:18
>>Telane+(OP)
If 5-ish includes 5.7", then the Librem 5 that I'm typing this on would qualify. It's still borderline too big for my tastes though.
◧◩◪◨
10. MBCook+eB1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 03:09:43
>>nebula+97
It’s a hell of a lot of phones.
◧◩◪◨
11. maelit+k62[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 10:22:42
>>nebula+97
In march of that year, but was higher before, no ? Anyway, that's ~ 3 million phones. It's a lot.
replies(1): >>hxtk+XC3
◧◩◪◨⬒
12. hxtk+XC3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-07 00:27:40
>>maelit+k62
I'm making this distinction post-hoc, so I already know how it turned out: they ultimately decided to stop making those smaller devices. I assume that means it wasn't enough sales to be a financially viable product, and to me, selling "enough" would mean that Apple found it profitable to maintain the supply chains and assembly lines for those smaller devices and continued to invest in the product.

Arguing against myself, Apple could be discontinuing the smaller models because they did market research and found that most buyers of smaller, cheaper devices could be converted to buyers of larger, more expensive devices if those smaller devices didn't exist. Auto manufacturers are doing just that, discontinuing or enlarging smaller light trucks in favor of larger models that are subject to less regulation and therefore can be designed and manufactured more cheaply and might offer even more profit.

If Apple has or had that strategy, then my assumptions are flawed because no matter how many mini iPhones they sell, they would still want to get rid of the line as long as most of those customers could be converted to full-size iPhone customers.

[go to top]