zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. prdona+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-05 16:35:30
And you moved at a glacial pace compared to Cloudflare. There are tradeoffs.
replies(1): >>theide+Xe
2. theide+Xe[view] [source] 2025-12-05 17:40:32
>>prdona+(OP)
Yes, of course, I want the organization that inserted itself into handling 20% of the world's internet traffic to move fast and break things. Like breaking the internet on a bi-weekly basis. Yep, great tradeoff there.

Give me a break.

replies(3): >>wvenab+6g >>jimmyd+Zp >>Jeremy+Yt
◧◩
3. wvenab+6g[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 17:45:20
>>theide+Xe
But if your job is mitigate attacks/issues then things can very broken while you're being slow to mitigate it.
◧◩
4. jimmyd+Zp[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 18:29:13
>>theide+Xe
While you're taking your break, exploits gain traction in the wild and one of the value propositions for using a service provider like CloudFlare is catching and mitigating theses exploits as fast as possible. From the OP, this outage was in relation to handling a nasty RCE.
◧◩
5. Jeremy+Yt[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 18:46:46
>>theide+Xe
Lest we forget, they initially rose to prominence by being cheaper than the existing solutions, not better, and I suppose this is a tradeoff a lot of their customers are willing to make.
[go to top]