zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. samrus+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-05 15:59:44
There are other men in the arena who arent tripping on their own feet
replies(1): >>usrnm+A1
2. usrnm+A1[view] [source] 2025-12-05 16:05:54
>>samrus+(OP)
Like who? Which large tech company doesn't have outages?
replies(3): >>k8sToG+Z2 >>k__+c3 >>nish__+te
◧◩
3. k8sToG+Z2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 16:10:40
>>usrnm+A1
It's not about outages. It's about the why. Hardware can fail. Bugs can happen. But to continue a roll out despite warning sings and without understanding the cause and impact is on another level. Especially if it is related to the same problem as last time.
replies(1): >>udev40+2e
◧◩
4. k__+c3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 16:11:28
>>usrnm+A1
"tripping on their own feet" == "not rolling back"
◧◩◪
5. udev40+2e[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 16:56:14
>>k8sToG+Z2
And yet, it's always clownflare breaking everything. Failures are inevitable, which is widely known, therefore we build resilience systems to overcome the inevitable
replies(1): >>deadba+Ek
◧◩
6. nish__+te[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 16:58:08
>>usrnm+A1
Google does pretty good.
replies(1): >>hanson+DG
◧◩◪◨
7. deadba+Ek[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 17:23:12
>>udev40+2e
It is healthy for tech companies to have outages, as they will build experience in resolving them. Success breeds complacency.
replies(1): >>wizzwi+h31
◧◩◪
8. hanson+DG[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 18:59:50
>>nish__+te
Google docs was just down a couple weeks ago almost the whole day.
◧◩◪◨⬒
9. wizzwi+h31[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 20:48:41
>>deadba+Ek
You don't need outages to build experience in resolving them, if you identify conditions that increase the risk of outages. Airlines can develop a lot of experience resolving issues that would lead to plane crashes, without actually crashing any planes.
[go to top]