zlacker

[parent] [thread] 11 comments
1. esafak+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-05 15:00:48
From my interaction with the Nim community, I came to the conclusion that nim could be more popular if its founder devolved decision making to scale up the community. I think he likes it the way it is; small, but his. He is Torvaldsesque in his social interactions.
replies(3): >>xigoi+k4 >>oscill+l4 >>naller+5f
2. xigoi+k4[view] [source] 2025-12-05 15:20:06
>>esafak+(OP)
Please no. Design by committee would lead to another C++.
replies(2): >>almost+a6 >>pjmlp+iI
3. oscill+l4[view] [source] 2025-12-05 15:20:11
>>esafak+(OP)
I worked in nim for a little bit and it truly has a lot of potential but ultimately abandoned it for the same reason. It's never going to grow beyond the founder's playground.
◧◩
4. almost+a6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 15:27:15
>>xigoi+k4
The second or third most popular language of all time? God forbid lol
replies(1): >>xigoi+K7
◧◩◪
5. xigoi+K7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 15:34:44
>>almost+a6
Popular does not mean good. Tobacco smoking is also popular.
replies(1): >>almost+D8
◧◩◪◨
6. almost+D8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 15:38:28
>>xigoi+K7
Do you think this is clever? For a metaphor to be relevant to a discussion it has to be fitting, not just a dunk.
replies(1): >>xigoi+z9
◧◩◪◨⬒
7. xigoi+z9[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 15:41:33
>>almost+D8
It’s not a metaphor. I was giving a counterexample to your implied claim that popularity is an indicator of quality.
replies(2): >>kanaff+pa >>ventur+HE1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
8. kanaff+pa[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 15:45:35
>>xigoi+z9
That wasn't an implied claim because we're not discussing metrics for judging quality.
9. naller+5f[view] [source] 2025-12-05 16:02:34
>>esafak+(OP)
I feel the same way - as I suspect a lot of people here do. Nim posts are always upvoted and usually people say nice things about the language in the comments.. but there are few who claim to actually -use- the language for more than a small private project, if even that.
replies(1): >>cb321+wx
◧◩
10. cb321+wx[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 17:17:42
>>naller+5f
The only way to really test out a programming language is by trying it out or reading how someone else approached a problem that you're interested in/know about.

There are over 2200 nimble packages now. Maybe not an eye-popping number, but there's still a good chance that somewhere in the json at https://github.com/nim-lang/packages you will find something interesting. There is also RosettaCode.org which has a lot of Nim example code.

This, of course, does not speak to the main point of this subthread about the founder but just to some "side ideas".

◧◩
11. pjmlp+iI[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 18:05:14
>>xigoi+k4
Languages with design by committee are a plenty, including all mainstream ones, not a single one is still being developed by a single person.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
12. ventur+HE1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 23:00:23
>>xigoi+z9
You're right. It's everyone's least-favorite gotcha. Reminds me of this:

Waiter: "How is everything?"

Customer: "Great!"

Waiter, disgusted: "Even war?"

[go to top]