zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. chii+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-05 08:22:25
> I really find these "in 2025" takes tiresome

exactly. This isn't a new problem. But what has been new is the recent growth in funding to "help" those who are deemed helpless - at someone else's cost (it could be taxpayers, it could be, in this case, other fee paying students).

The problem isn't the grift - it's the lack of any real oversight, and the ease with which such help is given lately (i would call it overly-progressive, but that might trigger some people). It is what makes grift possible.

replies(1): >>philip+kj
2. philip+kj[view] [source] 2025-12-05 10:01:00
>>chii+(OP)
> overly-progressive

I think if you capitalise the P it's fine. It's not actual progress, but the Progressive movement has pushed it. Because that philosophy has a naive view of people, and assumes the best. So their policies and spending allow tests with 100% sensitivity and 0% specificity.

[go to top]