zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. tomrod+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-04 20:35:55
Meh. I think you're overstating it. To meet your anecdata, I had both the first college year, and single > double by a large margin.
replies(2): >>Onawa+y2 >>IgorPa+fu
2. Onawa+y2[view] [source] 2025-12-04 20:49:13
>>tomrod+(OP)
It depends on the person. I lived alone in my last year of undergrad and it sent me into a deep depression. I figured out that living alone was too much isolation for me and moved back in with a roommate. That helped to pull me out of my depression and be able to finish my degree.
replies(1): >>duskdo+d21
3. IgorPa+fu[view] [source] 2025-12-04 23:14:22
>>tomrod+(OP)
I would not classify it as anecdata. This was research backed policy adopted by most US universities. Residential life and the Dean of Students office are usually doing a lot to cooperate with other universities. This part of US colleges is not competing with each other so they routinely share data, go to conferences together multiple times a year, and res. life directors move from college to college every few years so they all know each other incredibly well.

The point is that everyone who gets a single is super happy about it the same way that a drug addict is always happy when they get their drug of choice for free: of course it’s great. Of course it isn’t the best thing for you in the long run. I say this as someone who hated being in a double my first year and spent the next three in a single.

As far as I am concerned having apartments of 4-8 students where each has their own small room but shares a common space is ideal. But usually this is reserved for sophomore year and later.

◧◩
4. duskdo+d21[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 03:49:07
>>Onawa+y2
I don't think people advocating for more single rooms would say that no multi-occupancy rooms should exist for people who do want them.
[go to top]