zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. Rebuff+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-04 18:55:40
Thats true, but I think the blame is more on "American society" and not the kids working through the system.

50 years ago, college was cheaper. From what I understand getting jobs if you had a college degree was much easier. Social media didn't exist and people weren't connected to a universe of commentary 24/7. Kids are dealing with all this stuff, and if requesting a "disability accommodation" is helping them through it, that seems fine?

replies(3): >>OGEnth+M2 >>smcg+ca >>ericmc+Jz
2. OGEnth+M2[view] [source] 2025-12-04 19:12:24
>>Rebuff+(OP)
Indeed, it's much more reflective of American society in 2025 than it is of the individual students (or even Stanford in general).
replies(1): >>lupire+Tw4
3. smcg+ca[view] [source] 2025-12-04 19:48:35
>>Rebuff+(OP)
Failing out of college can be life-ruining. Tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars of high-interest non-dischargeable debt and employment opportunities completely nuked.
replies(1): >>nradov+of
◧◩
4. nradov+of[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 20:11:17
>>smcg+ca
Come on, let's be serious. Most Stanford undergraduate courses aren't that tough, grade inflation is rampant, and almost anyone who gets admitted can probably graduate regardless of accommodations or lack thereof. We're talking about the difference between getting an A or A- here. And Stanford has such generous financial aid that students from families earning less than $150K get free tuition so no one should be leaving with huge student debts.
replies(2): >>OGEnth+mi >>smcg+b61
◧◩◪
5. OGEnth+mi[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 20:23:33
>>nradov+of
> no one should be leaving with huge student debts.

"In the 2023-24 academic year, 88% of undergraduates graduated without debt, and those who borrowed graduated with a median debt of $13,723." Source: https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/02/stanford-sets-2025...

So strictly speaking, not "no one". (But certainly smaller than the national averages.)

6. ericmc+Jz[view] [source] 2025-12-04 21:50:49
>>Rebuff+(OP)
That seems naive, it would be like if we started dumping tons of deer food into the woods and the next year when deer are grossly overpopulated we thought "why are there so many deer now?".

Humans are as a mass dumb animals, if we give them the opportunity for individual gratification at long-term cost for the group they are going to take it immediately.

◧◩◪
7. smcg+b61[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 01:03:37
>>nradov+of
sorry, I often forget that I went to a university that's actually challenging, and that's not the typical case.
◧◩
8. lupire+Tw4[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 23:26:41
>>OGEnth+M2
2025 didn't invent sneaky.

"Snake oil" is over 100 years old.

[go to top]