zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. bluefi+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-04 18:30:47
Right. What I'm saying is that we've probably screwed up by creating a system that incentivizes people to "be disabled" even if they really are stretching the definition of disabled
replies(1): >>skywho+02
2. skywho+02[view] [source] 2025-12-04 18:40:28
>>bluefi+(OP)
I hope you realize that the students don’t think of themselves as “disabled” in the disparaging way you mean it. I have ADHD and I’m color blind. Both conditions make me “disabled” in some sense, and yet I went to college and have managed to have a job my whole adult life. Being “disabled” doesn’t mean “useless” or “incapable of doing anything” as you seem to imply.
replies(1): >>bluefi+eo1
◧◩
3. bluefi+eo1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 02:59:29
>>skywho+02
I don't think you understand my position and you're certainly reading tone I didn't intend into my words

I am nearsighted, I am ADHD, I am hearing impaired in one ear, I am celiac. All of these are lifetime conditions that are not going anywhere

If glasses didn't exist, I would certainly be disabled. But let's be real, no one considers glasses a disability, even though glasses are just as important to a vision impaired person as a wheelchair is to a walking impaired person

[go to top]