zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
8 comments
1. ameliu+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-12-04 15:39:46
At this point I'm going to assume that adding -Script to a trademarked name allows me to use that name freely.
replies(3):
>>riwsky+e3
>>RiverC+Qc
>>tshadd+Tw
◧
2. riwsky+e3
[view]
[source]
2025-12-04 15:58:28
>>ameliu+(OP)
JavaScriptScript?
replies(1):
>>joshjj+c8
◧◩
3. joshjj+c8
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-12-04 16:22:39
>>riwsky+e3
JavaScript-Script
replies(1):
>>unders+Wa
◧◩◪
4. unders+Wa
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-12-04 16:34:49
>>joshjj+c8
Kleenex-Script
◧
5. RiverC+Qc
[view]
[source]
2025-12-04 16:44:01
>>ameliu+(OP)
Oracl3Script?
replies(2):
>>ameliu+dt
>>lkjqwe+XB
◧◩
6. ameliu+dt
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-12-04 17:58:46
>>RiverC+Qc
Yeah, that's how I'm going to call my LLM-based law-firm.
◧
7. tshadd+Tw
[view]
[source]
2025-12-04 18:17:10
>>ameliu+(OP)
Unless that suffixed version is itself already trademarked, like AppleScript.
replies(1):
>>bobbyl+Y61
◧◩
8. lkjqwe+XB
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-12-04 18:40:44
>>RiverC+Qc
Turn it around: Scriptacle.
◧◩
9. bobbyl+Y61
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-12-04 21:09:40
>>tshadd+Tw
iPhoneScript should be fine though?
[go to top]