zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Xss3+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-04 15:32:36
Most cheaters are playing well outside of human limits and doing huge amounts of damage to the legitimate player experience. A 10% safety margin beyond human play sounds reasonable. A world where cheaters can only play 10% better than humans is a far better world than the one we are in at the moment.
replies(1): >>lukan+IJ1
2. lukan+IJ1[view] [source] 2025-12-05 00:44:57
>>Xss3+(OP)
"A world where cheaters can only play 10% better than humans is a far better world than the one we are in at the moment."

My world is pretty fine, as I don't play games on servers, without active admin/mods that kick and ban people who obviously cheat.

ML solutions can maybe help here, but I believe they can reliable detect cheats, without banning also lucky or skilled players, once I see it.

replies(1): >>Xss3+sX1
◧◩
3. Xss3+sX1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 02:43:06
>>lukan+IJ1
Human administration is not scalable.
replies(1): >>lukan+EV8
◧◩◪
4. lukan+EV8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-07 16:52:55
>>Xss3+sX1
Why not? As long as there are players, some of them also want to be admins. You maybe mean commercial administration is not scalable for games with a fixed price? Sure, but give the option to the community to manage (rent) servers on their own and they will solve it themself.
[go to top]