zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. onion2+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-04 15:23:57
Assuming Oracle did decide to go down that route, who would they sue? No one really uses the JavaScript name in anything official except for "JavaScriptCore" that Apple ships with Webkit.
replies(2): >>Orygin+V >>chucka+ll
◧
2. Orygin+V[view] [source] 2025-12-04 15:28:04
>>onion2+(OP)
Afaik they already sued Deno: https://deno.com/blog/deno-v-oracle2

Edit: Seems I'm incorrect, see below

replies(1): >>saghm+y1
◧◩
3. saghm+y1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 15:31:42
>>Orygin+V
I had no idea this was a thing! I'm surprised this didn't attract more attention.
replies(1): >>Orygin+62
◧◩◪
4. Orygin+62[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 15:35:07
>>saghm+y1
My bad, after reading more it seems Deno is trying to get Oracle's trademark revoked, but I found out that "Rust for Javascript" devs have received a cease and desist from Oracle regarding the JS trademark, which may have triggered Deno to go after Oracle.
◧
5. chucka+ll[view] [source] 2025-12-04 17:10:05
>>onion2+(OP)
> who would they sue

Anyone they feel like. Lawnmower gonna mow.

[go to top]