zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. lsafer+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-04 13:47:33
Their point was that WotC doesn't get the same flak that Value does when MtG is worse, by far, than cosmetic loot boxes.
replies(1): >>goosej+Eh1
2. goosej+Eh1[view] [source] 2025-12-04 20:25:10
>>lsafer+(OP)
Yes, I'm calling that questionable. Says who? TCGs have entire formats designed in opposition to the high cost random booster shit. I think that's pretty good evidence that there's high negative sentiment.

Valve is simply larger and took legal heat for people misusing the API.

replies(1): >>Tulliu+NI4
◧◩
3. Tulliu+NI4[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 19:04:01
>>goosej+Eh1
I'm saying based on sentiment I see as a gamer.

There's plenty of outrage about paid loot boxes and viewing them as terrible, terrible gambling that exploits consumers and ought to be regulated/banned. Not everyone agrees with this take, but it's still fairly widespread.

Now, you do see people pointing out that trading card games are basically still gambling -- and no one really disagrees with that -- you just don't see the same level of outrage about it. What you usually see is grudging acceptance, ala "what're ya gonna do, that's just how these card games are".

[go to top]