zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. resiro+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-04 12:24:42
It would be nice to have an open-source version that you can self-host. That would solve the abuse problem. Maybe with a service to create API keys.
replies(2): >>klipit+p1 >>cybera+Ag1
2. klipit+p1[view] [source] 2025-12-04 12:35:13
>>resiro+(OP)
Yeah, this is the next step. I first wanted to understand if this gets any traction. I think I will provide a dockerized version for the server part that you can just run with a simple command and maybe some interface to create api keys and distribute them to your users.
replies(1): >>popalc+qk1
3. cybera+Ag1[view] [source] 2025-12-04 19:29:53
>>resiro+(OP)
We're using pgrok for that in our organization. A small EC2 instance serves as the public endpoint.
◧◩
4. popalc+qk1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 19:47:03
>>klipit+p1
Fair enough from a business standpoint, but seeing as there are massive privacy/security risks involved in exposing your data to an opaque service, the open source component is probably a non-optional aspect of the value prop.
replies(1): >>rgbrgb+RG1
◧◩◪
5. rgbrgb+RG1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 21:30:10
>>popalc+qk1
how come? just because it's open source doesn't mean that they run that exact binary on their servers. ngrok does pretty well without open sourcing.
replies(1): >>popalc+Eh3
◧◩◪◨
6. popalc+Eh3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-05 10:40:52
>>rgbrgb+RG1
The locus of trust moves, if you have the source, and trust is a factor for you, because you can simply self-host and know what you're running.
[go to top]