zlacker

[parent] [thread] 9 comments
1. stuart+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-04 11:15:01
Apart from anything else, ECMAScript is a mouthful! Eeh-cee-emm-ay-script. Five syllables.
replies(5): >>tietje+k >>mbirth+m >>mattke+v >>hn_thr+T >>sph+n5
2. tietje+k[view] [source] 2025-12-04 11:17:30
>>stuart+(OP)
Don't most people just pronounce it Eck-ma?
3. mbirth+m[view] [source] 2025-12-04 11:17:56
>>stuart+(OP)
Since the association renamed itself to “Ecma International” in 1994, I believe we can just call it Eck-mah-script.
4. mattke+v[view] [source] 2025-12-04 11:19:29
>>stuart+(OP)
It's a genuinely terrible name.

Maybe it should just be pronounced eck-ma-script so it's got the same number of syllables as ja-va-script.

replies(2): >>lionko+K7 >>art0rz+g8
5. hn_thr+T[view] [source] 2025-12-04 11:23:09
>>stuart+(OP)
And it sounds like a skin condition.
replies(1): >>biofox+O3
◧◩
6. biofox+O3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 11:44:54
>>hn_thr+T
Flaky when under pressure? Irritating results? Sites look and feel better without it?

Sounds appropriate to me.

7. sph+n5[view] [source] 2025-12-04 11:54:56
>>stuart+(OP)
It should've been called AcmeScript. The association with Wile E. Coyote would've been fitting.
replies(1): >>somegu+Fn
◧◩
8. lionko+K7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 12:10:37
>>mattke+v
It is pronounced like that, typically
◧◩
9. art0rz+g8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 12:13:46
>>mattke+v
I've only ever heard it pronounced as "EcmaScript" not E-C-M-A Script"
◧◩
10. somegu+Fn[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 14:02:45
>>sph+n5
That’s actually the perfect name for it!
[go to top]