zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. panick+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-04 07:23:47
One of the issues with founders is that they get really into one specific idea and sink the company, rather then to switch strategy.
replies(1): >>idiots+gE
2. idiots+gE[view] [source] 2025-12-04 13:06:49
>>panick+(OP)
As opposed to shareholders, who ravenously seek to maximize short term profits and sink the company.
replies(1): >>arcfou+OJ
◧◩
3. arcfou+OJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 13:44:22
>>idiots+gE
That's why there are no publicly-traded companies more than a decade or two old. Oh, wait...
replies(1): >>delect+zU
◧◩◪
4. delect+zU[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 14:48:27
>>arcfou+OJ
The comment you replied to was just pointing out that, like how a founder-held company can get stuck pursuing the founder's obsession, a stock market held company can also single-mindedly pursue quarterly gains to the detriment of long-term health.

There are old companies in either model.

replies(1): >>arcfou+ou2
◧◩◪◨
5. arcfou+ou2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 22:52:22
>>delect+zU
It didn't say can. It stated it rather definitively, which I wanted to point out the absurdity of.
[go to top]