zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. conrad+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-04 07:19:43
I do not speak for the 'club, but I believe it was resolved: >>45292042
replies(1): >>sundar+bE
2. sundar+bE[view] [source] 2025-12-04 13:03:44
>>conrad+(OP)
Yes, as I mentioned, Slack made a U-turn after the thread got popular and became a PR disaster (after having ignored the issue again and again previously). That kind of behaviour indicates a service that shouldn't be relied on so much, at least not without low-friction alternates that you keep ready to jump onto, in case some exec there decides again that the Club is too tempting a prize to not attempt another squeeze.
[go to top]