zlacker

[parent] [thread] 13 comments
1. catlov+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-03 23:13:11
I always found the fact that he named a company after himself to be pretty off-putting, personally

Also, didn't said company piss people off in some way that led to Open Tofu being created?

replies(9): >>defen+0y >>cholan+Iy >>ceocod+zJ >>Fnoord+WO >>davids+NP >>mstade+cf1 >>wpm+wx1 >>osigur+5I1 >>mixmas+h33
2. defen+0y[view] [source] 2025-12-04 04:08:04
>>catlov+(OP)
Dell, HP, Walmart, Johnson & Johnson, Ford...it's not exactly unheard of to name your company after yourself.
replies(1): >>caseyo+Hy
◧◩
3. caseyo+Hy[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 04:17:51
>>defen+0y
Exactly. A huge number of household brands are named after people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_companies_named_after_...
4. cholan+Iy[view] [source] 2025-12-04 04:18:10
>>catlov+(OP)
IIRC, he was on his way out by the time the BSL shenanigans were underway.
5. ceocod+zJ[view] [source] 2025-12-04 06:30:28
>>catlov+(OP)
Ferrari, McLaren, Pagani, Lamborghini, Tata, Honda, Toyota, Wal-Mart, Zuora (named after the two founders), Garmin (also named after the two founders).
replies(1): >>nylons+ua9
6. Fnoord+WO[view] [source] 2025-12-04 07:29:24
>>catlov+(OP)
Or it shows the person stands behind their company, and isn't shy to take the responsibility.
7. davids+NP[view] [source] 2025-12-04 07:38:52
>>catlov+(OP)
Ever heard of Debian or Linux?
replies(2): >>flavio+8V >>Vinnl+nq1
◧◩
8. flavio+8V[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 08:33:22
>>davids+NP
Linux was named Freax by Linus, but other people didn't like it and started calling it Linux and it just stuck
9. mstade+cf1[view] [source] 2025-12-04 11:30:53
>>catlov+(OP)
I don't know the specifics of naming that particular company, but being the majority stakeholder of two companies myself I can tell you that naming companies is just as hard as naming things in programming. Both of my companies are named after myself, one directly so and the other being a portmanteau of my business partner's and my names.

It had very little to do with self aggrandizing and more to do with the tax authorities need a name and time was limited. The names were used mostly as placeholders and then stuck. Branding is hard.

◧◩
10. Vinnl+nq1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 12:51:31
>>davids+NP
And Git :)
11. wpm+wx1[view] [source] 2025-12-04 13:39:39
>>catlov+(OP)
Hashicorp is a good name though it’d be hard to pass up
12. osigur+5I1[view] [source] 2025-12-04 14:43:26
>>catlov+(OP)
He mentioned in an interview Hashicorp was just a corporate entity that he used as a teenager to do some contracting here and there. He and the other founder weren't that keen on using it but the name stuck.
13. mixmas+h33[view] [source] 2025-12-04 21:28:24
>>catlov+(OP)
Charles Schwab has written (my memory) that putting one's name on the business stakes its reputation there, and such a business is theoretically more trustworthy.
◧◩
14. nylons+ua9[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 21:45:50
>>ceocod+zJ
Automattic and New Relic if we're looking within software
[go to top]