zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. charci+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-03 20:40:02
I never said they were forced to support, but that they are forced to fund such a thing for their game as opposed to their being an option for Valve to fund it.
replies(1): >>sophro+lr
2. sophro+lr[view] [source] 2025-12-03 23:02:00
>>charci+(OP)
They aren't forced to fund anything. They have the option for an additional value add, that's all.
replies(1): >>charci+nI
◧◩
3. charci+nI[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 01:06:55
>>sophro+lr
Valve is known for never funding games which is why my original comment expressed surprise. Of course they aren't forced to fund content on their platform, but I had thought they had changed their strategy.
replies(1): >>johnny+FN
◧◩◪
4. johnny+FN[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 02:02:03
>>charci+nI
The clsoest thing to funding we ever got was Activision getting Valve to lower the cut for big publishers so they could get onto Steam.

Otherwise, I can't remember the last time they funded a game they didn't make themselves. Maybe in the very early Steam days, but that's long past.

[go to top]