zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. jimbob+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-03 20:23:00
To be fair, they may have just wrecked the CS lootbox economy permanently.
replies(2): >>ceedan+C2 >>Schema+En
2. ceedan+C2[view] [source] 2025-12-03 20:34:01
>>jimbob+(OP)
They need to keep wrecking it. Skins should just be fixed cost items.
replies(2): >>bigyab+qj >>intern+Tn
◧◩
3. bigyab+qj[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-03 22:00:17
>>ceedan+C2
Disagreed. Games like Fortnite and League of Legends went down this road and ended up at even more unfathomable $500 microtransactions. The only issue with skin trading is that people will take it more seriously than it is, which is a problem with all cosmetic systems.
replies(1): >>ceedan+IJ7
4. Schema+En[view] [source] 2025-12-03 22:20:51
>>jimbob+(OP)
It was getting out of control when tiktok "investment guides" were instructing people who don't even play the game to start buying CS skins to make a profit.
◧◩
5. intern+Tn[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-03 22:22:13
>>ceedan+C2
Nah. Digital items should be transferable, similar to physical gacha like Pokemon cards.
replies(1): >>Qwerti+pg1
◧◩◪
6. Qwerti+pg1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 06:32:37
>>intern+Tn
That doesn't mean they should be reliable speculation vehicles. AFAIK Valve hasn't interfered with the gifting of digital items, only sales.
◧◩◪
7. ceedan+IJ7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-06 00:38:40
>>bigyab+qj
There are huge gambling cultures around skins. All kinds of theft and scamming. There is no "only issue". There are tons of issues
[go to top]