zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. bertil+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-03 18:25:50
Unfortunately, this will not happen. Even if they have it all working:

Above all, Apple wants to show that their hardware is awesome, especially because it really is. Running x86 games or compatibility layers even with great emulation will make that $3000 Mac look half decent at best, against a $1500 gaming laptop. Simply not the story Apple want to tell.

replies(1): >>throwa+w5
2. throwa+w5[view] [source] 2025-12-03 18:51:52
>>bertil+(OP)
If apple wanted to show that they have good hardware they wouldn't gimp the iPad pro with iOS. They really don't care.
replies(1): >>wiethe+wb
◧◩
3. wiethe+wb[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-03 19:22:32
>>throwa+w5
Currently, someone interested in an iPad and needing the power of a MB, will have to buy both.

If they stopped restricting the iPad, those people would only have to buy an iPad.

And as someone without a single interest in an iPad, I would worry that removing the iPad limitations would increase its market-share and lead to Apple reducing even more their interest in the MB, which would be terrible news to me.

replies(1): >>commak+Zc
◧◩◪
4. commak+Zc[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-03 19:29:03
>>wiethe+wb
I used to understand/agree with this point, but over the past few years i've transitioned to my ipad pro for mobile usage and it has become my daily driver for mobile computing. When i need macos for anything, i typically will use Jump to connect and do something real quick, but that's rare. I'm starting to not understand why i wouldn't just want an ipad pro running a touch friendly (and i mean it would have to be VERY touch friendly) version of macos. again, i would have normally agreed with you, but that line is starting to blur for me...
[go to top]