zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. jve+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-03 08:03:26
Well except Google that got sued for US$8.8 Billion because they decided to use specific API signatures but provide their own implementation...?!
replies(3): >>Hedepi+e1 >>Orange+v1 >>krzyk+w91
2. Hedepi+e1[view] [source] 2025-12-03 08:13:15
>>jve+(OP)
... and Oracle lost
replies(1): >>cwillu+rp
3. Orange+v1[view] [source] 2025-12-03 08:15:07
>>jve+(OP)
Come on, that's a completely different story, Google made their own independent SDK using but incompatible with Java. Nobody's arguing you should do that.

Plus last time I checked Oracle lost that lawsuit.

◧◩
4. cwillu+rp[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-03 11:04:48
>>Hedepi+e1
And the lesson is not to trust Oracle.
5. krzyk+w91[view] [source] 2025-12-03 15:53:12
>>jve+(OP)
What Google did was similar what Microsoft did back in the days. Marketing something as Java, but wasn't Java.
replies(1): >>pjmlp+V34
◧◩
6. pjmlp+V34[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-04 12:52:12
>>krzyk+w91
It incredible how far the "Do not evil" marketing won the hearts of computing nerds, Google only got positive karma for doing with Android exactly what Microsoft did with J++.

To this day Android Java is not fully compatible with Java proper, and Kotlin became Google's version of C#.

[go to top]