zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. MegaDe+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-11-19 19:36:00
A completely different language, a decade of development to Perl 6, and Python eating its lunch in the meantime. Perl is often called a write only language, and there's Python with

    for line in file:
If you were new to the field at that time, Python seemed like a no-brainer.
replies(1): >>afc+v5
2. afc+v5[view] [source] 2025-11-19 20:01:49
>>MegaDe+(OP)
Even as an experienced developer who even owned CPAN modules and was very familiar with the Unix ways, Python was a no-brainer.

I mention this on light of the article's claim that this has to do with "a new generation of programmers brought up on … I don’t know, Microsoft systems, Visual Basic and Java". No. The new languages that appeared were just so much much better.

replies(1): >>bombca+uJ
◧◩
3. bombca+uJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-19 23:39:31
>>afc+v5
When you have advantages that often come down to "it works great on a teletype over 150 baud" (read, compressed syntax, regex, etc) you will eventually be beaten by something that is easier to read at a glance.

Non-programmers read python and sometimes even Java and say "huh, this is something that could be figured out" - reading perl was reading line noise.

APL is probably one of the most powerful languages out there, but the characters in the syntax scare most away.

[go to top]