zlacker

How do you move past the initial hurdle of the at least several first iterations of this device being inferior to the competition in every single way, though?

And even if you solve the software issue, a “modular” phone like that will be bulky, heavy and have permanently outdated hw without really offering anything in return for that for >95% of its potential user base.

> to force people to upgrade.

So if they had to pick between a modern device with closed hw/software and something allegedly good enough for them but has an inferior screen, camera, battery, is heavier and has poor quality software. How do you force them to buy it?

>>wqaatw+(OP)
> How do you move past the initial hurdle of the at least several first iterations of this device being inferior to the competition in every single way, though?

I think it will initially be a phone for hackers, and they will develop the ecosystem. It will also be competitive in that different manufacturers will try to develop the best components for the market.

>>cy6erl+31
The problem though is that there is no market. No one wants this thing, no one will buy this thing, hence no manufacturers will care to develop or sell any of the modules.

Sure there's maybe a few thousand hackers, but the phone market is measured in hundreds of millions, not thousands.

The phone itself will be inferior in hardware, inferior in software, inferior in services, inferior in support, and so on.

There us no market.