zlacker

EU should fork Android. Fund a small team of devs, nothing fancy, no major changes just keep it secure.

>>dvh+(OP)
The EU (and adjacent countries like UK or Schengen countries) loves surveillance and control of their citizens' speech (except if they're partbof their wealthy elite, in which case, there's nothing to see here).

>>dvh+(OP)
On paper this is a good idea but consider the current chat control issue. This fork would probably have built-in by default content, messages scanning and switching to any other Android would probably be ruled out as illegal.

>>dvh+(OP)
Quaero was a disaster - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaero

So many committees - so little progress.

>>dvh+(OP)
I think governments funding software development could be a useful counterweight in an industry dominated by a few giant corporations, similar to how lots of countries have state funded media alongside commercial options.

But the EU forking Android is not a remotely realistic starting point. How do you persuade manufacturers to use it? Would Google license its proprietary apps to run on it? How will the small team of devs cope with whatever changes are coming in hardware next year? Forking Android is easy, making your fork a viable alternative is almost impossible.

In theory the EU could throw its weight around and demand that Google & OEMs work with 'EUdroid' if they want to sell phones in Europe. But that would be a massive political fight, much bigger than funding a few developers.

>>dvh+(OP)
Does the EU even want you to be able to use government and banking apps on a non-secure device? Or do they want the device to have SafetyNet Attestation?

Doesn't the EU want encryption backdoors and such too?

>>isaacr+V
Claiming control of citizens speech when you have a president literally censoring your media is kind of ridiculous.

The claim free speech is under threat in Europe just demonstrates you are easily led by rabble rousers.