zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. shaky-+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-03 16:26:06
Hundreds of lines that you have to carefully read and understand.
replies(3): >>victor+X5 >>ImPost+Wr >>fastba+4b1
2. victor+X5[view] [source] 2025-06-03 17:00:10
>>shaky-+(OP)
Depends on what it is doing. A html template without JS? Enough to just check if it looks right and works.
3. ImPost+Wr[view] [source] 2025-06-03 19:09:11
>>shaky-+(OP)
You also have to do that with code you write without LLM assistance.
4. fastba+4b1[view] [source] 2025-06-04 00:55:33
>>shaky-+(OP)
Are you not doing that already?

I go line-by-line through the code that I wrote (in my git client) before I stage+commit it.

replies(2): >>shaky-+wq5 >>nipah+knm
◧◩
5. shaky-+wq5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-05 15:29:14
>>fastba+4b1
Yes, but you know the kind of code you write. When you re-check it, you are looking for minor typos, no major logic flaws affecting half the committed code.
◧◩
6. nipah+knm[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-12 13:47:31
>>fastba+4b1
You read at the same speed line-by-line your code when you are in your git client?

You are doing something wrong. I go line-by-line through my code like 7x faster than I would do it for someone's else code, because I know what I wrote, my own intentions, my flow of coding and all of those details. I can just look at it en passant, while with AI code I need to carefully review every single detail and the connection between them to approve it.

[go to top]