zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. okthro+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-03 02:44:45
It was clearly rhetorical
replies(1): >>Bjartr+2R
2. Bjartr+2R[view] [source] 2025-06-03 12:05:27
>>okthro+(OP)
Even if it were, which I disagree, treating it was though it were a plain sincere question instead of rhetorical would lead to better discussions.
replies(1): >>dkdcio+UW1
◧◩
3. dkdcio+UW1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 18:47:09
>>Bjartr+2R
Yeah I was a bit snarky, my bad. I was also genuinely curious though, as it did seem like an odd question that probably had a point behind it.
[go to top]