zlacker

I think I agree with the general thrust but I have to say I've yet to be impressed with LLMs for web search. I think part of that comes from most people using Google as the benchmark, which has been hot garbage for years now. It's not hard to be better than having to dig 3 sponsored results deep to get started parsing the list of SEO spam, let alone the thing you were actually searching for.

But compared to using Kagi, I've found found LLMs end up wasting more of my time by returning a superficial survey with frequent oversights and mistakes. At the final tally I've still found it faster to just do it myself.

I will say I do love LLMs for getting a better idea of what to search for, and for picking details out of larger blocks.

>>vohk+(OP)
> I think part of that comes from most people using Google as the benchmark, which has been hot garbage for years now.

Honestly, I think part of the decline of Google Search is because it's trying to increase the amount of AI in search.

>>jcranm+F2
It’s part of it. It was on the decline and then for some reason Google decided that the best way to handle their dumpster fire was to chuck gasoline cans into it.

>>vohk+(OP)
I find search engines like Google and Bing are so overly keen on displaying any results that they'll ignore your search parameters and return something else instead.

Thus, I find LLMs quite useful when trying to find info on niches that are close to a very popular topic, but different in some key way that's hard to express in search terms that won't get ignored.