zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. grzm+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-02 22:25:54
Yes. And the author of the submission.
replies(1): >>Mofpof+Rc
2. Mofpof+Rc[view] [source] 2025-06-02 23:50:31
>>grzm+(OP)
OMG I didn't notice. Way to burn down a huge amount of respect stemming from past cryptography work in just one blog post.
replies(1): >>dogeco+xx
◧◩
3. dogeco+xx[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 03:17:46
>>Mofpof+Rc
it's irksome to see tptacek having his patio11 moment for sure.
replies(1): >>tptace+8B
◧◩◪
4. tptace+8B[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 04:03:46
>>dogeco+xx
What does this even mean? (I should be so lucky.)
[go to top]