zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. bawolf+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:42:22
Sometimes i feel like people who really like AI have a very different experience programming then i do.

They are constantly talking about AI doing all the tedious boilerplate bullshit. Don't get me wrong, some of my code is that too and its not fun. However the pro-AI people talk as if 80% of your day is dealing with that. For me its simply a rare enough occurence that the value proposition isn't that big. If that is the killer app of AI, it just doesn't sound that exciting to me.

replies(2): >>Fridge+M >>prisen+J6
2. Fridge+M[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:46:41
>>bawolf+(OP)
When I see someone talk about the reams of boilerplate they’re getting the LLM to write for them, I really do wonder what godawful sounding tools and tech-stack they’re being subjected to.
replies(2): >>JoshTr+v1 >>rudedo+q8
◧◩
3. JoshTr+v1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-02 21:50:24
>>Fridge+M
Exactly. Back in the day, people talked about "design patterns". It took a while for (some of) the industry to recognize that "design patterns" are a sign that your libraries and tools aren't good enough, because you're having to write the same patterns repeatedly.
4. prisen+J6[view] [source] 2025-06-02 22:23:55
>>bawolf+(OP)
Unpopular opinion, boilerplate is good for you. It's a warmup before a marathon. Writing it can be contemplative and zen-like and allows you to consider the shape of the future.
replies(1): >>Mofpof+2o
◧◩
5. rudedo+q8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-02 22:34:09
>>Fridge+M
Anything where you’re doing basic CRUD apps. Yes there are generators, but not for everything. For me that’s where LLMs have been the most useful.
◧◩
6. Mofpof+2o[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 00:24:49
>>prisen+J6
Strongly agreed. And, your wording is excellent.
[go to top]