zlacker

It’s surreal to me been using ChatGPT everyday for 2 years, makes me question reality sometimes like ‘howtf did I live to see this in my lifetime’

I’m only 39, really thought this was something reserved for the news on my hospital tv deathbed.

>>mentos+(OP)
I turned 38 a few months ago, same thing here. I would love to go back in time 5 years and tell myself about what's to come. 33yo me wouldn't have believed it.

>>mentos+(OP)
Ok, but do you not remember IBM Watson beating the human players on Jeopardy in 2011? The current NLP based neural networks termed AI isn't so incredibly new. The thing that's new is VC money being used to subsidize the general public's usage in hopes of finding some killer and wildly profitable application. Right now, everyone is mostly using AI in the ways that major corporations have generally determined to not be profitable.

>>hattma+GN
That 'Watson' was fully purpose built though and ran on '2,880 POWER7 processor threads and 16 terabytes of RAM'.

'Watson' was amazing branding that they managed to push with this publicity stunt, but nothing generally useful came out of it as far as I know.

(I've worked with 'Watson' products in the past and any implementation took a lot of manual effort.)

>>wicked+Yb1
Watson is more generally the computer system that was running the LLM. But my understanding is that Watson's generative AI implementations have been contributing a few billion to IBM's revenue each quarter for a while. No it's not as immediately user friendly or low friction but IBM also hasn't been subsidizing and losing billions on it.

>>hattma+WL1
What they had in the Jeopardy era was far from an LLM or GenAI. From what I've been able to deduce, they had a massive Lucene index of data that they expected to be relevant for Jeopary. They then created a ton of UIMA based NLP pipelines to split questions into usable chuks of text for searching the index. Then they had a bunch of Jeopardy specific logic to rank the possible answers that the index provided. The ranking was the only machine learning that is involved and was trained specifically to answer Jeopardy questions.

The Watson that ended up being sold is a brand, nothing more, nothing less. It's the tools they used to build the thing that won Jeopardy, but not that thing. And yes, you're right that they managed to sell Watson branded products, I worked on implementing them in some places. Some were useless, some were pretty useful and cool. All of them were completely different products sold under the Watson brand and often had nothing in common with the thing that won Jeopardy, except for the name.

>>hattma+GN
That's not entirely true though, the "Attention is All You Need" paper that first came up with the transformer architecture that would go on to drive all the popular LLMs of today came out in 2017. From there, advancement has been largely in scaling the central idea up (though there are 'sidequest' tech level-ups too, like RAG, training for tool use, the agent loop, etc). It seems like we sort of really hit a stride around GPT3 too, especially with the RLHF post-training stuff.

So there was at least some technical advancement mixed in with all the VC money between 2011 and today - it's not all just tossing dollars around. (Though of course we can't ignore that all this scaling of transformers did cost a ton of money).