zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. ofjcih+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:28:28
I’m uninterested in giving you content. In particular because of your past behavior.

Thanks for the offer though.

replies(2): >>tptace+Y >>throwa+95
2. tptace+Y[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:33:38
>>ofjcih+(OP)
Kurt, how dare you.
replies(1): >>ofjcih+G9
3. throwa+95[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:57:08
>>ofjcih+(OP)
> past behavior

Do go on.

◧◩
4. ofjcih+G9[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-02 22:25:32
>>tptace+Y
You wouldn’t happen to work for fly.io as well, would you?

Edit: Nm, thought I remembered your UN and see on your profile that you do.

replies(1): >>grzm+K9
◧◩◪
5. grzm+K9[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-02 22:25:54
>>ofjcih+G9
Yes. And the author of the submission.
replies(1): >>Mofpof+Bm
◧◩◪◨
6. Mofpof+Bm[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-02 23:50:31
>>grzm+K9
OMG I didn't notice. Way to burn down a huge amount of respect stemming from past cryptography work in just one blog post.
replies(1): >>dogeco+hH
◧◩◪◨⬒
7. dogeco+hH[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 03:17:46
>>Mofpof+Bm
it's irksome to see tptacek having his patio11 moment for sure.
replies(1): >>tptace+SK
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
8. tptace+SK[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 04:03:46
>>dogeco+hH
What does this even mean? (I should be so lucky.)
[go to top]