zlacker

PLEASE write your response. We'll publish it on the Fly.io blog. Unedited. If you want.

>>mrkurt+(OP)
Maybe make a video of how you're vibecoding a valuable project in an existing codebase, and how agents are saving you time by running your tools in a loop.

>>mrkurt+(OP)
I’m uninterested in giving you content. In particular because of your past behavior.

Thanks for the offer though.

>>ofjcih+C1
Kurt, how dare you.

>>kubb+m1
Seriously… thats the one thing I never see being posted? Is it because Agent mode will take 30-40 minutes to just bookstrap a project and create some file?

>>ofjcih+C1
> past behavior

Do go on.

>>metalt+16
It takes like 2-6 minutes to do that, depending on the scope of the project

>>kubb+m1
So they can cherry pick the 1 out of 10 times that it actually performs in an impressive manner? That's the essence of most AI demos/"benchmarks" I've seen.

Testing for myself has always yielded unimpressive results. Maybe I'm just unlucky?

>>tptace+A2
You wouldn’t happen to work for fly.io as well, would you?

Edit: Nm, thought I remembered your UN and see on your profile that you do.

>>ofjcih+ib
Yes. And the author of the submission.

>>grzm+mb
OMG I didn't notice. Way to burn down a huge amount of respect stemming from past cryptography work in just one blog post.

>>metalt+16
Well no, the reality of this workflow is the farcica, abject failures unleashed on the Dotnet codebase a week ago.

>>44050152

>>Mofpof+do
it's irksome to see tptacek having his patio11 moment for sure.

>>dogeco+TI
What does this even mean? (I should be so lucky.)

>>andrep+x9
Livestream would be fair.