zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Flemlo+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-02 18:35:42
The way the input doesn't match the output should imply that it's not just statistics.

As soon as compression happens, optimization happens which can lead to rules/learning of principles which got feed by statistics.

replies(1): >>immibi+Ir
2. immibi+Ir[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:42:02
>>Flemlo+(OP)
That's "just" more statistics though.
replies(1): >>Flemlo+3N1
◧◩
3. Flemlo+3N1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 10:56:13
>>immibi+Ir
Are you good in math definitions or is this an opinion?

For me a compressed model learning rules through statistics is not statistics anymore.

Physic rules are not statistics.

replies(1): >>immibi+WO2
◧◩◪
4. immibi+WO2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 17:37:12
>>Flemlo+3N1
Of course they are. Force has a strong correlation with mass times acceleration. Objects at rest have a high chance of being observed to remain at rest. And so on.
replies(1): >>Flemlo+7c3
◧◩◪◨
5. Flemlo+7c3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 19:52:28
>>immibi+WO2
Statistic is not the same as constant equations.
replies(1): >>immibi+R4e
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. immibi+R4e[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-08 09:27:54
>>Flemlo+7c3
The equations were discovered by experiment and curve-fitting.
[go to top]