zlacker

Reason about: sure. Independently solve novel ones without extreme amounts of guidance: I have yet to see it.

Granted, for most language and programming tasks, you don’t need the latter, only the former.

>>hypera+(OP)
99.9% of humans will never solve a novel problem. It's a bad benchmark to use here

>>Workac+a8
I agree. But it’s worth being somewhat skeptical of ASI scenarios if you can’t, for example, give a well formulated math problem to a LLM and it cannot solve it. Until we get a Reimann hypothesis calculator (or equivalent for hard/old unsolved maths) it’s kind of silly to be debating the extreme ends of AI cognition theory

>>Workac+a8
But they will solve a problem novel to them, since they haven't read all of the text that exists.

>>hypera+8g
"I'm taking this talking dog right back to the pound. It completely whiffed on both Riemann and Goldbach. And you should see the buffer overflows in the C++ code it wrote for me."

>>Camper+ms1
dog is a very different category man-made godlike super-intelligence