zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. tines+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-20 02:10:48
That’s not the implied conclusion my guy. That’s the statement.
replies(1): >>n2d4+Q1
2. n2d4+Q1[view] [source] 2025-05-20 02:34:13
>>tines+(OP)
Then what do you claim the implied conclusion is?
replies(1): >>Jenk+Cp
◧◩
3. Jenk+Cp[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 07:20:00
>>n2d4+Q1
That the number of successful (as in, merged and works) contributions are greater than those that did not.
[go to top]