zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
3 comments
1. n2d4+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-05-20 00:35:10
The implied conclusion ("Copilot made 1000 changes to the codebase") is also not survivorship bias.
By that logic, literally every statement would be survivorship bias.
replies(1):
>>tines+99
◧
2. tines+99
[view]
[source]
2025-05-20 02:10:48
>>n2d4+(OP)
That’s not the implied conclusion my guy. That’s the statement.
replies(1):
>>n2d4+Za
◧◩
3. n2d4+Za
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-05-20 02:34:13
>>tines+99
Then what do you claim the implied conclusion is?
replies(1):
>>Jenk+Ly
◧◩◪
4. Jenk+Ly
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-05-20 07:20:00
>>n2d4+Za
That the number of successful (as in, merged and works) contributions are greater than those that did not.
[go to top]