zlacker

Dilbert creator Scott Adams says he will die soon from same cancer as Joe Biden

submitted by dale_h+(OP) on 2025-05-19 17:00:43 | 452 points 469 comments
[view article] [source] [go to bottom]

NOTE: showing posts with links only show all posts
1. toomuc+n4[view] [source] 2025-05-19 17:20:20
>>dale_h+(OP)
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1924477866915315722
◧◩◪
18. FireBe+Nh[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 18:24:42
>>jimt12+Ka
Two of my favorites:

Catbert on work life balance: "Give us some balance, you selfish hag" https://steemitimages.com/p/7258xSVeJbKnFEnBwjKLhL15SoynbgJK...

The other, I can never seem to find. They're all in a meeting, and the Pointy Haired Boss says, "This next task is critical yet thankless and urgent, and will go to whoever next makes eye contact with me". Everyone stares at the desk, and then Alice pulls out a hand mirror and angles it between the PHB and Wally.

◧◩◪◨
28. teddyh+Km[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 18:46:45
>>FireBe+Nh
> Catbert on work life balance: "Give us some balance, you selfish hag"

Better link: <https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1998-05-05>

> The other, I can never seem to find.

Here you are: <https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1993-08-30>

◧◩◪◨
38. ActorN+pv[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 19:32:27
>>orions+Do
Figuring on what you actually want in life and working towards that is productive, yes.

But that's mild compared to what he says. He basically says he can influence the stock market with affirmations.

You should read the chapters. https://www.scribd.com/doc/156175634/the-dilbert-future-pdf. Starts on 218.

◧◩◪◨⬒
39. abirch+1y[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 19:46:43
>>mcv+Jo
It's such a great book. You can skip the first few chapters as the evidence for those chapters on priming hasn't been replicated: https://replicationindex.com/2017/02/02/reconstruction-of-a-...

However, the fundamental ideas of System 1 and 2 have made me rethink so many things.

◧◩◪◨⬒
45. joseph+SB[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 20:10:40
>>jimt12+9B
Reminds me of when someone did an April Fools prank that printers would require payment to use, and then got in big trouble, but only because management was about to implement that policy for real: >>43543743
◧◩◪◨⬒
57. netsha+tE[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 20:25:36
>>ActorN+pv
As Carl Sagan wrote in The Demon-Haunted World, millions of people probably prayed earnestly for God to save their king/queen, but kings and queens don't live beyond the average lifespans of humans...

If you want to read a book that's closer to how the universe actually works, and how your mind should operate, read it: https://archive.org/details/B-001-001-709

◧◩◪
73. dctoed+hI[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 20:45:35
>>jimt12+Ka
Since we're posting favorites, here's one about lawyers, which I show to my contract-drafting students every semester:

https://web.archive.org/web/20230301101359/https://dilbert.c...

77. afluka+5J[view] [source] 2025-05-19 20:50:31
>>dale_h+(OP)
Some of you cite your favorite strips. I will too.

Dilbert comes down to the caves where trolls (accountants) reside and gets a tour. The guide points to a troll sitting behind a desk, and mumbling in a stupor: "nine, nine, nine...".

Guide: And this is our random numbers generator.

Dilbert: Are you sure those are random?

Guide: That's the problem with randomness - you can never be sure.

Edit: Found it here: https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-quest-for-rand....

And thank you, Scott - many laughs thanks to you.

◧◩◪
80. throwa+jJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 20:51:42
>>ActorN+ri
"eschews" means "To avoid, shun" (https://www.oed.com/dictionary/eschew_v1?tab=meaning_and_use...)
◧◩◪
98. ars+6O[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 21:23:41
>>Admira+3M
> or that he has known about it longer than he has admitted.

Which is probably true. And it's fine, he has no obligation to disclose this until he wants to. In contrast his dementia though ....... that's something he should have disclosed earlier.

Edit: "Several doctors told Reuters that cancers like this are typically diagnosed before they reach such an advanced stage." from https://www.reuters.com/world/us/bidens-cancer-diagnosis-pro...

◧◩
105. teuobk+3P[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 21:28:43
>>aantix+CA
Current evidence is that PSA tests don't actually save lives:

https://thennt.com/nnt/psa-test-to-screen-for-prostate-cance...

I wish they did, of course. I personally lost a close friend to prostate cancer last year. He was 41 and was, before the cancer, one of the healthiest and most athletic people I knew.

The first inkling he had that anything was wrong was a backache that wouldn't go away; a stage 4 diagnosis ensued. He held on for 21 months from the onset of symptoms before the cancer took him.

◧◩◪◨
113. teddyh+0Q[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 21:34:58
>>dctoed+hI
Better link: <https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/2008-08-28>
◧◩◪
114. Invict+lQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 21:37:46
>>Admira+3M
There is a NYT article up right now pondering the same question: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/19/us/politics/biden-cancer-...
◧◩
118. teddyh+UQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 21:41:24
>>afluka+5J
Better link: <https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/2001-10-25>
◧◩◪
128. Herodo+mU[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 22:04:36
>>waynec+PO
It should be patient dependent. Screening everyone is not currently thought to be useful but those with risk factors should be screened after a discussion of risks/benefits. Your father having prostate cancer (especially if he was diagnosed before age 65) is a risk and I would advocate for it, especially if it something you are worried about and you understand that sometimes a PSA can be falsely elevated in benign conditions, which may mean you get a biopsy that ultimately wasn’t necessary, and the potential risks that could have.

For a good short overview: https://www.cancer.gov/types/prostate/psa-fact-sheet

And read “is the PSA test recommended…”

◧◩
132. teddyh+4V[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 22:08:53
>>CSMast+hf
Link: <https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/2010-09-01>
◧◩
139. ChrisM+FW[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 22:18:57
>>ravens+A8
I was a Dilbert fanatic for a long time.

Adams, himself? Not so much. I think he tends to have a rather nasty outlook on humanity, and I had a hard time reconciling it.

I do know that he was/is pretty much about as far away from Diamond Joe* as you can get. Interesting that they seem to be fighting the same battle.

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden_(The_Onion)

◧◩◪◨
149. 7402+601[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 22:49:56
>>conduc+VX
Not routine at age 82: "most organizations recommend stopping the screening around age 70" https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/psa-test/in-dept...
◧◩◪
167. ThatPl+481[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 23:52:03
>>ghurta+D61
XKCD has a different random number: https://xkcd.com/221/
◧◩
173. judah+F91[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 00:08:10
>>afluka+5J
The following[0] is my favorite because my company is hardening security by making everything difficult and painful, especially single-sign on:

[Mordac] "Security is more important than usability. In a perfect world, no one would able able to use anything."

[Asok's computer screen]: "To complete login procedure, stare directly at the sun."

[0]: https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/2007-11-16

◧◩◪
174. fidotr+ha1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 00:13:02
>>judah+F91
He also covered the opposite extreme:

https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1995-03-25

◧◩
176. pfdiet+Db1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 00:26:17
>>w10-1+NQ
Remember this one?

https://dynamicsgptipsandtraps.wordpress.com/wp-content/uplo...

"The clue meter is reading zero."

Everyone at Motorola recognized it immediately.

◧◩
195. airstr+5g1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 01:12:46
>>afluka+5J
This is a classic and probably my favorite https://devhumor.com/media/dilbert-s-team-writes-a-minivan
◧◩◪
220. pwg+um1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 02:19:36
>>judah+F91
I especially like this one:

https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1998-08-24

It has hit home a time or two when the "managers" hire in a "consultant".

◧◩
221. kbutle+Xm1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 02:25:03
>>afluka+5J
Hardware happiness - I've enjoyed checking in to these specs every few years...

35" monitor 20 megs of ram 1.2 gigabytes of hard disk space

https://web.archive.org/web/20150205042406/https://dilbert.c...

◧◩
233. FireBe+mq1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 03:07:30
>>afluka+5J
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fe...

Dilbert is trapped in the bowels of Accounting.

Dogbert: I understand you have Dilbert. Free him, or else...

Troll: Or else what?

Dogbert: Or else I will put this cap on my head backwards! Your little hardwired accounting brain will explode just looking at it!

Dilbert: What was that popping sound?

Dogbert: A paradigm shifting without a clutch.

◧◩◪◨⬒
242. jonste+Es1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 03:35:13
>>quanti+kj1
Very nice Repo Man reference. Well done.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dI-gt7GrNAA

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
243. defros+Os1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 03:38:15
>>ch4s3+nk1
"His odiousness" was less a personal jihad to see Rushdie killed and more the end result of ill considered comments about what different systems of law state after being drawn in and questioned on the contentious issue live.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_Stevens%27_comments_about_...

◧◩◪◨⬒
249. MPSimm+wu1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 03:58:11
>>2muchc+Ol1
Fritz Haber has entered the chat. His first paragraph sounds pretty solid:

>Fritz Jakob Haber (German: [ˈfʁɪt͡s ˈhaːbɐ] ⓘ; 9 December 1868 – 29 January 1934) was a German chemist who received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1918 for his invention of the Haber process, a method used in industry to synthesize ammonia from nitrogen gas and hydrogen gas. This invention is important for the large-scale synthesis of fertilizers and explosives.[4] It is estimated that a third of annual global food production uses ammonia from the Haber–Bosch process, and that this food supports nearly half the world's population.[5][6] For this work, Haber has been called one of the most important scientists and industrial chemists in human history.[7][8][9] Haber also, along with Max Born, proposed the Born–Haber cycle as a method for evaluating the lattice energy of an ionic solid.

The second paragraph gives the context:

>Haber, a known German nationalist, is also considered the "father of chemical warfare" for his years of pioneering work developing and weaponizing chlorine and other poisonous gases during World War I. He first proposed the use of the heavier-than-air chlorine gas as a weapon to break the trench deadlock during the Second Battle of Ypres. His work was later used, without his direct involvement,[10] to develop the Zyklon B pesticide used for the killing of more than 1 million Jews in gas chambers in the greater context of the Holocaust.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_Haber

◧◩◪◨
250. russdi+zu1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 03:59:01
>>wredco+9s1
Pretty much anywhere you look, you find instances https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lollipop_(1958_song)
◧◩◪◨⬒
259. maxlyb+Uw1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 04:29:33
>>jimt12+9B
That reminds me that he got lots of comments from upset readers because shortly after Mother Teresa died, one comic's punchline involved 100 nuns dying in a plane crash ( https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1997-09-13 ). He swears that he drew the comic months before, and had no real idea when it would run, but many readers thought the timing was too good to be accidental.
273. irjust+Dz1[view] [source] 2025-05-20 05:02:15
>>dale_h+(OP)
If you or anyone in your family history has had prostate, its worth keeping an eye on this: >>43801906

If the hypothesis turns out to be true, prostate cancer could be easily defeated before it has a chance to take a hold.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
285. dragon+SC1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 05:48:06
>>NoMore+041
IIRC, European elites (nobility and royalty both, and royals more than lesser nobles) until something like the 17th-18th century overall lived shorter lives than the general population, largely because they spent more of their lives in cities, which were extremely unhealthy until fairly recently; more recently, though, British royalty has, for example, been living much longer [1] than the British population at large.

[1] https://theconversation.com/long-live-the-monarchy-british-r...

◧◩◪
288. randcr+FD1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 05:58:22
>>waynec+PO
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/prostate-cancer/detectio...

You have a direct genetic history of prostate cancer, thus you are at higher risk than most men. At age 57 I had no family history and no symptoms, yet my primary care doc suggested I be tested anyway. My PSA was in fact elevated. I got a biopsy and found my prostate was 80% cancerous. I got it surgically removed just in time. 10 years later I'm still cancer free.

Every day I five thanks that my doctor did NOT follow the standard medical advice back then NOT to test. Forewarned is forearmed.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
291. defros+bH1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 06:34:37
>>WarOnP+Ww1
The context for one of the two(?) TV statements on air was Geoffrey Robertson's Hypotheticals.

Great TV factual, devilish, host led open panel discussion about hair trigger dilemmas of real life and law staged by an international QC (now KC) and human rights lawyer.

It was literally about exploring the gap between written law, law as practicied, morals and ethics, and circumstances that would test anyone.

Cat Stevens / Yusuf Islam was a typical guest .. an everyman of no particular deep study into such things, just one of many on the Clapham omnibus.

Taking anything said by anyone on that particular show, sans context, as a literal statement of their core personal belief is tenuous at best.

Good show concept though, pity it's not around anymore: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Robertson#Media_caree...

305. jagerm+NQ1[view] [source] 2025-05-20 08:08:56
>>dale_h+(OP)
Sucks for him, I hope he recovers or manages somehow. On the other hand, he is not a good guy. If you want to go deeper, there are some episodes on Behind the Bastards dedicated to him. https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-behind-the-bastards-29236...
◧◩◪◨⬒
309. reshlo+6S1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 08:21:00
>>verisi+qI1
> Here, we tested this putative asymmetry using neuroimaging: we recorded oscillatory neural activity using magnetoencephalography while 55 participants completed a well-validated neuroimaging paradigm for empathy to vicarious suffering... This neural empathy response was significantly stronger in the leftist than in the rightist group.[0]

> Our large-scale investigation of the relation between political orientation and prosociality suggests that supporters of left-wing ideologies may indeed be more prosocial than supporters of right-wing ideologies... However, the relation between political orientation and prosociality is fragile, and discovering it may depend on the methods used to operationalize prosociality in particular... Nonetheless, we are confident that our investigation has brought us one step closer to solving the puzzle about whether our political orientation is intertwined with how prosocial we behave toward unknown others—which we cautiously answer in the affirmative.[1]

[0] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10281241/

[1] https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19485506241298341

◧◩
312. bayind+zX1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 09:12:24
>>afluka+5J
I keep this taped on my cubicle: https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/2008-02-12

Not because somebody did that to me, but I had to migrate two racks of systems in one night under literal and proverbial heat due to former one.

You can think pointy haired as the embodiment of Murphy of Murphy's laws.

◧◩
317. tim333+552[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 10:30:24
>>w10-1+NQ
Here's a theory why Scott went from funny to a bit weird alt right. For much of the time he was getting users sending office stories by email, but in more recent times was on twitter and getting info from the alt right bunch on there who push a lot of weird stuff. The reason he got banned from most papers was getting sucked into this stuff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_okay_to_be_white
329. incomi+I92[view] [source] 2025-05-20 11:17:40
>>dale_h+(OP)
https://www.npr.org/2023/02/26/1159580425/newspapers-have-dr...

I wonder what he has been up to the last couple years.

◧◩◪
330. tim333+pc2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 11:38:33
>>legits+Pn
Some of the recent stuff is ok. For example https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd....
◧◩◪◨⬒
335. _pigpe+kh2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 12:15:00
>>tarvai+9d1
Everyone knows that six is the most boring number. https://youtu.be/G4OTRRmyTAA?feature=shared
◧◩
357. xhkkff+XM2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 15:22:32
>>w10-1+NQ
There were plenty of cartoons in the paper that solicited ideas from readers. There Ought To Be a Law comes to mind, but I'm sure there were others.

https://archive.jsonline.com/greensheet/there-oughta-be-a-la...

◧◩◪◨⬒
363. inferi+sQ2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 15:40:59
>>RickJW+GB2
Time to take off your blinders? Trump accused Biden of hiding his cancer diagnosis and conservatives are running with that narrative.

https://old.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/1kqlri6/they_...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-jr-mocks-jill-230953...

https://www.npr.org/2025/05/19/nx-s1-5403887/trump-biden-can...

◧◩◪◨⬒
367. slg+RR2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 15:48:57
>>RickJW+GB2
> I didn’t see a single unsympathetic comment.

Literally from the president[1], his son[2], and his VP[3]. Do these conspiracy theories about Biden hiding his diagnosis sound sympathetic to you?

>Teslas stock decline

So you want us to be empathetic to the guy who has directly said that "The fundamental weakness of western civilization is empathy"?[4]

[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DrhLWbWiPU&t=147s

[2] - https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-jr-escalates-disgust...

[3] - https://www.13abc.com/2025/05/20/vance-questions-whether-bid...

[4] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTV_FBiHiag&t=7s

◧◩◪◨
370. dragon+OT2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 15:58:43
>>7thacc+qG2
> I hadn't really thought about the twitter angle you talk about, but did notice his blog started changing back in 2016ish.

People were commenting on it long before 2016ish.

It’s been a long time since the name Scott Adams was associated with wit, subtlety, reason or honesty. But the Dilbert creator, men’s rights blowhard and world’s greatest imaginary fan of his own “certified genius” proved recently that as gross as you may already think Scott Adams is, he’s prepared to get even grosser.

— Mary Elizabeth Williams, “Scott Adams’ defense of rape mentality”, Salon, June 20, 2011

EDIT: forgot to link the article, https://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/scott_adams_dilbert_rape_re...

373. revere+fX2[view] [source] 2025-05-20 16:17:12
>>dale_h+(OP)
I thought he was going to be hunted for being a Republican. That's what he told us.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/dilbert-creator-scott-ad...

◧◩
375. Sohcah+403[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 16:36:40
>>deepsu+oH1
> TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome)

I've always thought the definition of TDS was completely backwards. I've too often seen legitimate criticisms of Trump deflected with claims of TDS. Certainly it's the zealous cult-like worshipping of Trump that's deranged.

https://imgur.com/a/n1MjXxI

◧◩
400. ja27+Bp3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 19:31:28
>>afluka+5J
One of my favorites.

Also the one where Wally insists his towel gets cleaner every time he uses it: https://br.omega.com/dilbert/311.html

There's one somewhere where they're eating lunch and I think Wally asks Dilbert if he has any extra napkins and Dilbert says he won't know until he's done eating.

◧◩◪◨⬒
401. slg+7q3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 19:34:13
>>hydrog+Is2
Well said. And it is probably worth a point of clarification, since some of these replies are acting as if I said that conservatives can't be compassionate. That isn't what I'm saying. I'm specifically using a definition of empathy like the following (emphasis mine)[1]:

>the ability to share someone else's feelings or experiences by imagining what it would be like to be in that person's situation

It isn't a question of caring about people. It is a question of being able to put yourself in the shoes of a stranger with which you might not have anything in common. If you can do that, you will likely have general compassion for immigrants, the poor, the sick, minorities, LGBTQ+ folks, and really anyone who is being persecuted, oppressed, or unjustly burdened by something outside their control. That is fundamentally a more left leaning mindset.

If you need more direct experience (and that includes hearing a firsthand account from someone you are counseling) to engender that compassion, you are more likely to only extend this compassion to people who you share a lot with like your family, friends, and community (not just geographically), while people outside those groups wouldn't automatically be granted that compassion. This is fundamentally a more right leaning mindset.

The respective "radii of emapthy" are just different sizes.

[1] - https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/empathy

404. aaroni+ow3[view] [source] 2025-05-20 20:14:59
>>dale_h+(OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZIm_2MgdeA seems relevant
◧◩◪◨⬒
413. randcr+dE3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 21:08:28
>>waynec+3P2
Yes, but I have no personal knowledge about radical prophylactic prostatectomy. You might start here:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361217707_The_role_...

I've read very little about choosing radical prostatectomy very early after detection, but it's likely that it does little to improve survivability:

https://medicine.washu.edu/news/surgery-early-prostate-cance...

That said, if nerve-sparing surgery were done early instead of doing NON-nerve-sparing surgery later (a standard radical prostatectomy), perhaps that might diminish some of the typical side-effects of the standard surgery like impotence or incontinence. But I'm only speculating.

◧◩◪◨⬒
414. dragon+mJ3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-20 21:48:27
>>wooooo+JD3
> One of his peers was black

AFAIK, the only non-White recurring Dilbert character was Asok the Intern, who was Indian.

A black character (who Adams himself described as the first black character in Dilbert) did appear in 2022, but, well...

https://www.reddit.com/r/onejoke/comments/ugunog/after_33_ye...

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
433. cowboy+W35[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-21 13:43:32
>>defros+9o4
according to wikipedia "it was just a joke bro" lol, at the time during the show, did anybody laugh? If its the video I just watched, nobody was laughing.

    In a statement in the FAQ section of one of his websites, Islam asserted
    that while he regretted the comments, he was joking and that the show was 
    improperly edited.[94]
I just don't see how the video I watched could have been editted in such a way that would misconstrue the words I just saw mouthed by this guy.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-2750537/Video-1...

◧◩◪
438. teddyh+zr5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-21 15:57:52
>>pfdiet+Db1
Better link: <https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1995-03-02>
◧◩◪
439. teddyh+Sr5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-21 16:00:13
>>airstr+5g1
Better link: <https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1995-11-13>
◧◩◪
440. teddyh+Ds5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-21 16:04:03
>>ja27+Bp3
Better link: <https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1995-11-24>

> There's one somewhere where they're eating lunch and I think Wally asks Dilbert if he has any extra napkins

This one: <https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1994-10-29>

◧◩◪
441. teddyh+Ms5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-21 16:04:50
>>FireBe+mq1
Better link: <https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1995-08-25>
◧◩◪
442. teddyh+Xs5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-21 16:05:59
>>kbutle+Xm1
Better link: <https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1994-02-19>
◧◩◪◨
443. kbutle+6v5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-21 16:17:00
>>teddyh+Xs5
Thanks!

Any bets which link stays valid longer?

I also like this related comic: https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1995-07-12 https://web.archive.org/web/20150309041557/http://dilbert.co...

◧◩◪◨
444. teddyh+ZG5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-21 17:23:08
>>fallin+lu1
Link: <http://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/2017-02-22>
◧◩
445. toomuc+Q96[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-21 19:54:11
>>toomuc+n4
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Adams
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
453. jxjnsk+EK6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-22 01:25:21
>>ch4s3+nk1
He claims he never supported the fatwa

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/sep/27/yusuf-c...

◧◩◪◨
454. jxjnsk+mL6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-22 01:33:56
>>thephy+Oh1
Do we know for a fact that Michael Jackson did anything wrong? On Wikipedia you can read that the original accuser suspect his son was being molested, and asked for money or he would go to the police. Doesn't this undermine the credibility of the accuser?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Michael_Jackson_sexual_...

> Chandler demanded money from Jackson, threatening to go to a criminal court, but no agreement was reached. After Jordan told a psychiatrist that Jackson had molested him, the Los Angeles Police Department began a criminal investigation. The investigation found no physical evidence against Jackson.

Update, I just read that entire page and it seems obvious the whole thing was a set up.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
459. 7402+Ph9[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-22 22:01:19
>>dragon+5V2
Indeed: "Mr. Biden’s last-known prostate-specific antigen test, the most common way to screen for prostate cancer, was in 2014. Mr. Biden would have been 71 or 72 years old at the time." https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/20/us/politics/biden-prostat...
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦▧▨
461. defros+uI9[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-23 02:23:33
>>cowboy+fE9
> I have already read the "Hypotheticals".

The transcripts of the TV show? https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3616539-geoffrey-roberts...

That seems dry, but okay.

> Is he saying God is merely a "Hypothetical"?

Which "he"? Islam|Stevens or Robertson .. in either case, no, God being Hypothetical was not a central thesis of the show although it's likely something that was bantered about somewhere in the course of at least one of those scenarios.

Maybe look through the transcripts for some mention of any God(s).

> hehe I liked steve martins take on that egyptian thing

I confess I'm unsure as to how Steve Martin (Banjo playing comedian slash actor Martin?) ties into this .. but yes, Hypothetical is a partially scripted staged drama that explored tricky situations, Trolley Problems, and difficult judgements that creep up on people at the edges of law and morality.

The host literally assigned real people "personas" that matched some aspects of that persons real life experience and then asked them to react as their persona through a series of increasingly conflicting and escalating events of the sort that often end up in court.

What ever Cat Stevens is doing there in the show he is absolutely not independantly taking the stage on his own to declare a Fatwa on Rushdie and to call on all Muslims to hunt him down and punish him .. which was the original up thread claim about his behaviour.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦▧▨◲◳
463. defros+Iba[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-23 08:43:09
>>cowboy+LS9
> so ok I get all of what your saying except what you're leaving out, what was the hypothesis?

These shows by Robertson had no single scenario, each started with (say) news that people in a cafe had been taken hostage by a unknown assailant .. and built from there. First one guest representing law and order might be asked what their response would be, then they are informed that demands have been made to release convicted terrorists (say). This might build and involve a diplomat, a former singer in the public eye pressed for comment, etc.

I haven't said as I literally last watched the one in question some forty years ago.

Perhaps you can fill us all in given, as you said above, you've read the transcripts and hopefully still have a copy you can look up.

> the steve martin bit is how to do a proper cosplay

Riiigght. Okay. Sure. Bit random. Personally I largely preferred Damian Cowell over Cat Stevens and|or Steve Martin on a banjo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLAFy7o7Zvo

[go to top]