zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. YuxiLi+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-09 19:55:35
First, apologies for writing "symbolic-logical AI". It should have been "symbolic-logical AGI".

Second, I agree that the failure of the symbolic-logical approach to AGI is not justified in-text. I believe that it will only be a small component to the first AGI system, as an API for the AGI to use some tools like a calculator, a proof verifier, etc. A way to invoke the "crystalized intelligence" as it is. Nevertheless, since it is not justified in-text, and a justification would probably as a short essay, and is not necessary for the essay itself, it has been removed.

replies(1): >>YeGobl+ph1
2. YeGobl+ph1[view] [source] 2025-04-10 08:32:25
>>YuxiLi+(OP)
I'm sorry you felt the need to edit your text, it was not my intention to cause you to do that.
[go to top]