zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. YeGobl+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-09 18:08:50
Demonstrate.
replies(1): >>adastr+dk1
2. adastr+dk1[view] [source] 2025-04-10 03:42:50
>>YeGobl+(OP)
It would take you all of 5 seconds to try in Claude yourself. I do this work on a daily basis; I know its value.
replies(1): >>YeGobl+zJ1
◧◩
3. YeGobl+zJ1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-10 08:40:57
>>adastr+dk1
Do you mean you create SAT solvers with Claude on a daily basis? What is the use case for that?
replies(1): >>adastr+HF2
◧◩◪
4. adastr+HF2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-10 16:34:15
>>YeGobl+zJ1
I ask Claude to solve problems of similar complexity on a daily basis. A SAT solver specifically is maybe a once a week thing.

Use cases are anything, really. Determine resource allocation for a large project, or do Monte Carlo simulation of various financial and risk models. Looking at a problem that has a bunch of solutions with various trade-offs, pick the best strategy given various input constraints.

There are specialized tools out there that you can pay an arm and a leg for a license to do this, or you can have Claude one-off a project that gets the same result for $0.50 of AI credits. We live in an age of unprecedented intelligence abundance, and people are not used to this. I can have Claude implement something that would take a team of engineers months or years to do, and use it once then throw it away.

I say Claude specifically because in my experience none of the other models are really able to handle tasks like this.

Edit: an example prompt I put here: >>43639320

replies(1): >>YeGobl+GU2
◧◩◪◨
5. YeGobl+GU2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-10 18:03:37
>>adastr+HF2
Talk is cheap. The bottom line is that I don't see any SAT solvers that you generated with Claude.
replies(1): >>adastr+eg3
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. adastr+eg3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-10 20:42:44
>>YeGobl+GU2
It’s not my job to make one for you.
[go to top]